Journal on Baltic Security logo


  • Latest call
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. Issues
  3. Volume 11, Issue 2 (2025)
  4. Gender Equality in AI-Supported Military ...

Journal on Baltic Security

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • Related articles
  • More
    Article info Full article Related articles

Gender Equality in AI-Supported Military Education: Literature Insights and Evidence from Turkish Institutions
Volume 11, Issue 2 (2025), pp. 124–156
Ceyda Kuloğlu   Murat Koçanli  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.57767/jobs_2025_010
Pub. online: 31 December 2025      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access

Received
10 October 2025
Accepted
9 November 2025
Published
31 December 2025

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly discussed as a transformative tool for professional military education, particularly through simulations, adaptive learning platforms, and data-driven assessment systems. However, the integration of AI into military education has largely proceeded without sufficient attention to gender equality, despite extensive evidence that algorithmic systems can reproduce and amplify existing social biases. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature on AI and education, feminist military studies, and international policy frameworks such as NATO’s Principles of Responsible Use and the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, this article critically examines the implications of AI-supported military education from a gender perspective.
The study combines a comprehensive literature review with qualitative field research conducted at three major military educational institutions in Türkiye: the National Defence University, the NATO Centre of Excellence for Defence Against Terrorism (COE-DAT), and the Turkish Gendarmerie and Coast Guard Academy. Findings reveal a dual gap: while AI-supported educational tools are largely absent in these institutions, gender perspectives and WPS principles are also almost entirely missing from curricula and training practices. This absence raises concerns about institutional readiness for the future integration of AI, particularly regarding the risk that gender-blind environments may inadvertently embed bias into emerging AI-supported educational systems. The article argues that aligning AI adoption with gender-sensitive frameworks is essential for maintaining the integrity, inclusivity and effectiveness of military education. It concludes by offering recommendations for integrating AI and gender equality in a mutually reinforcing manner, in line with NATO commitments and broader ethical standards.

References

 
 
Baker, Ryan S. and Hawn, Aaron. (2022) ‘Algorithmic Bias in Education’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), pp. 1052-1092.
 
Barron, Maria and Bentil, Ekua Nuama. (2024) ‘Bridging the AI Divide: Breaking Down Barriers to Ensure Women’s Leadership and Participation in the Fifth Industrial Revolution’, [online] World Bank Blogs, 25 April. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/education/Bridging-the-AI-divide-Breaking-down-barriers .
 
Biggs, Adam T. (2025) ‘Enhancing Professional Military Education with AI: Best Practices for Effective Implementation’, Journal of Military Learning, 19(1), pp. 22-35.
 
Carreiras, Helena (2004) Gender and the Military: A Comparative Study on the Participation of Women in the Armed Forces of Western Democracies. Doctoral dissertation. Florence, Italy: European University Institute.
 
Cernat, Romică. (2022) ‘Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems – Emerging and Potentially Disruptive Technology’, in Romanian Military Thinking International Scientific Conference Proceedings. Bucharest, Romania: Centrul tehnic-editorial al armatei, pp. 156-175. Available at: https://en-gmr.mapn.ro/webroot/fileslib/upload/files/arhiva%20reviste/RMT/2022/conference%202022/RMT_CONF_2022.pdf.
 
Chandler, Kathrine. (2021) Does Military AI have Gender? Understanding Bias and Promoting Ethical Approaches in Military Applications of AI. Geneva, Switzerland: UNIDIR. Available at: https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/UNIDIR_Does_Military_AI_Have_Gender.pdf
 
Enloe, Cynthia. (2020) The Big Push: Exposing and Challenging the Persistence of Patriarchy. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
 
Eynon, Rebecca. (2023) ‘Algorithmic Bias, Education and Data Justice’, in OECD digital education outlook 2023. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
 
Gaikwad, M.R.R.. (2025) ‘Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Military Education: Opportunities and Challenges’, JET Journal of Education and Technology, 4 (1), pp. 45-60.
 
Guilbeault, D., Delecourt, S. and Desikan, B.S. (2025) ‘Age and Gender Distortion in Online Media and Large Language Models’, Nature, 646, pp. 1129-1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09581-z
 
Hodwitz, O., Knoll-Frey, K. and Koller, S. (2022) ‘Gender-Disaggregated Data: Regional Analyses of Criminal Justice Outcomes in Terrorism Prosecutions’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 78, pp. 101-115. https://www.tmmm.tsk.tr/publication/researches/16-GenderDisaggregatedData.pdf
 
Holvikivi, A. (2021) ‘Training the Troops on Gender: The Making of a Transnational Practice’, International Peacekeeping, 28(2), pp. 175-199.
 
Idowu, J.A. (2024) ‘Investigating Algorithmic Bias in Student Progress Monitoring’, Journal of Educational Data Mining, 16(2), pp. 95-112.
 
Kalim, U., Kanwar, A., Sha, J., and Huang, R. (2025) ‘Barriers to AI adoption for Women in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Asian Context’, Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 38.
 
Kirby, S.N., Thie, H.J., Naftel, S. and Adelson, M. (2010) ‘Diversity and the Success of Entering Classes at the U.S. Service Academies’, RAND Corporation. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9496.html
 
Kordzadeh, N. and Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022) ‘Algorithmic Bias: Review, Synthesis, and Future Research Directions’, European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), pp. 388-409.
 
Kuloglu, C. (2005) The Military in Turkey from a Gender Perspective. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ankara, Türkiye: Middle East Technical University.
 
Kurç, Ç. (2023) Enabling Technology of Future warfare: Defense AI in Turkey. Available at: https://defenseai.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/DAIO_Study2308.pdf
 
NATO (2022) Summary of NATO’s Autonomy Implementation Plan. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2022/10/13/summary-of-natos-autonomy-implementation-plan
 
NATO (2024a) Summary of NATO’s Revised Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategy. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2024/07/10/summary-of-natos-revised-artificial-intelligence-ai-strategy
 
NATO (2024b) NATO Policy on Women, Peace, and Security. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2024/07/10/nato-policy-on-women-peace-and-security-2024
 
National Education Association (n.d.) ‘Does AI have a Bias Problem?’, NEA Today. Available at: https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/does-ai-have-bias-problem .
 
O’Neil, C. (2017) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York, New York: Crown Publishers.
 
Putra, H. (2024) ‘The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Learning Motivation of Military Students’, Nurture, 2 (1), pp. 1-15.
 
Reese, H. (2025) ‘Researchers Uncover AI Bias Against Older Working Women’, Stanford News, 17 October. Available at: https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/10/ai-llms-age-bias-older-working-women-research .
 
UNESCO (2019) ‘Beijing Consensus on Artificial Intelligence and Education’, UNESCO. Paris, France: UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368303 .
 
UNESCO (2021) ‘AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-Makers’, UNESCO. Paris, France: UNESCO. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-education-guidance-policy-makers .
 
UNESCO (2024) ‘Generative AI: UNESCO Study Reveals Evidence of Bias’, UNESCO. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/generative-ai-unesco-study-reveals-alarming-evidence-regressive-gender-stereotypes .
 
UN Security Council. (2000) Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security. S/RES/1325. Available at: UN Security Council resolution 1325 on women and peace and security (2000) UN Women – Headquarters. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/WPS%20SRES1325%20.pdf .
 
UN Women (2025) Facts and Figures: Women, Peace and Security. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/facts-and-figures/facts-and-figures-women-peace-and-security .
 
UNIDIR (2025) Artificial Intelligence and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda. UNIDIR. Geneva, Switzerland: UNIDIR. Available at: https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UNIDIR_Artificial-Intelligence-and-the-Women-Peace-and-Security-Agenda.pdf .

Full article Related articles PDF XML
Full article Related articles PDF XML

Copyright
Open Access. ©
by logo by logo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Keywords
Artificial Intelligence Gender Equality Military Education Peace and Security Women

Metrics
since May 2021
281

Article info
views

0

Full article
views

121

PDF
downloads

40

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

Journal on Baltic Security

  • Online ISSN: 2382-9230
  • Print ISSN: 2382-9222
  • Copyright © 2021 Baltic Defence College

About

  • About journal

For contributors

  • Submit
  • OA Policy
  • Become a Peer-reviewer

Contact us

  • Baltic Defence College,
    Riia 12, 51010,
    Tartu, Estonia
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy