Editorial Introduction: Artificial Intelligence in Professional Military Education: Patterns for Human-AI Collaboration
Volume 11, Issue 2 (2025), pp. 1–11
Pub. online: 29 December 2025
Type: Editorial
Open Access
Published
29 December 2025
29 December 2025
Abstract
Professional Military Education faces a fundamental challenge: preparing leaders to collaborate effectively with AI capabilities that evolve faster than curriculum cycles, in operational contexts still being defined, against adversaries who conceptualise AI through different strategic logics. This editorial introduction frames the Journal on Baltic Security special issue on Artificial Intelligence in Professional Military Education, presenting a distinction between command functions (requiring human judgment) and control functions (amenable to AI augmentation) that emerged from collaborative exploration among Baltic-Nordic defence organisations and NATO institutions. Three patterns of effective human-AI collaboration – Strategic Sense-Making, Ethical Responsibility, and Adaptive Command – provide the conceptual thread connecting six diverse contributions spanning adversary paradigm analysis, technology survey, NATO cognitive infrastructure, gender and inclusion, practitioner reflection, and empirical framework development. The introduction identifies implementation gaps requiring continued attention and points toward future collaborative work addressing practical solutions for PME institutions navigating AI integration.
References
Notes
AI Statement:
[1] The introduction to a special issue on human-AI collaboration
deserves an AI statement that demonstrates the framework rather than simply discloses tool
use – it should model what the issue advocates: transparency that actually works. Given
the issue's focus, I want to show this in practice.
This introduction was developed through human-AI collaboration reflecting the
command-control framework presented in this special issue. Command functions remained
with me as Guest Editor: determining thematic architecture, deciding how to position
each contribution, ensuring the final voice reflected my editorial intent. Control functions
were augmented through Anthropic's Claude: synthesising across manuscripts, generating structural
options, and drafting sections for my revision.
The three collaboration patterns operated throughout. Strategic Sense-Making:
Claude identified thematic patterns across manuscripts while I determined which connections
held significance. Ethical Responsibility: Claude generated framing options while I evaluated
each against contributors' intentions. Adaptive Command: my editorial objectives guided Claude-augmented analysis throughout.
The final product is mine.